Skip to main content
OZ 2.0 | State Resource

Idaho

Designated · 25 tracts

Last checked 2026-06-16

25

Designated tracts (of 81 eligible)

9

Rural designated — QROF treatment

5

Former OZ 1.0 tracts redesignated

57

Days until designations take effect

How Idaho chose

Treasury published the final list on October 30, 2026. Idaho designated 25 of 81 eligible tracts, its full allocation, in 14 of 24 counties with eligible tracts. Designations take effect January 1, 2027 and run through December 31, 2036. Treasury's October list has 1 more eligible tract here than the April appendix, qualified under its missing-data rules; 0 were designated.

Compared with the eligible tracts it passed over, Idaho favored Urban Institute Tier 1 tracts, renter-heavy tracts and former OZ 1.0 tracts.

Trait Designated Passed over
Former OZ 1.0 tract 20% 8.9%
Rural (QROF) 36% 42.9%
Urban Institute Tier 1 52% 25%
Median poverty rate 20.9% 20.4%
Median family income, % of area 66.1% 66.5%
Residents of color (mean) 27% 27.5%
Median density, people / sq mi 2,689 2,540

Poverty and income: Treasury's own eligibility figures (ACS 2020–2024). Demographics: ACS 2020–2024. Former OZ 1.0 = at least half the tract's land area was in a 2018 QOZ. How every state compares →

29 OZ 1.0 tracts in Idaho were not redesignated. They stay OZ 1.0 zones through December 31, 2028, but under Notice 2026-40 new capital after 2026 generally cannot enter them except under a working capital safe harbor plan adopted by December 31, 2026. If a project in one of these tracts is mid-stream, that deadline is the one that matters. The county table below shows where they are. Transition rules →
Record: how Idaho ran its nomination input process

Nomination process

Community input window closed 2026-06-30. The state is now in internal review.

Idaho Commerce administers the OZ 2.0 nomination process and has published a nomination portal open to cities, counties, and tribal governments; submissions go to OZ@commerce.idaho.gov. Idaho Commerce has set a state-level submission deadline of 4:00 p.m. MT on June 30, 2026, restricted to city, county, and tribal government submitters. The federal nomination window under Rev. Proc. 2026-14 opened July 1, 2026, and runs 90 days (extendable to October 28, 2026). Idaho has 80 eligible tracts and, under the statutory minimum for states with fewer than 100 eligible tracts, may nominate up to 25 zones — the same count as its OZ 1.0 round. In the 2018 round, Idaho Commerce received applications from cities, counties, and tribes, which were reviewed by the Idaho Economic Advisory Council (EAC) before the Governor forwarded nominations to Treasury; a similar internal review is expected for OZ 2.0, though Idaho Commerce has not yet published formal selection criteria.

Map: designated and eligible tracts

Loading 81 eligible tracts…

View on EIG map → Treasury designation files (XLSX) Source: Treasury 2027 QOZ designations (Oct. 30, 2026) · IRS Rev. Proc. 2026-14 · EIG DCI 2023 · FFIEC CRA 2025 · Urban Institute 2026

Designated tracts by county

The county is usually the first local partner on an OZ deal — zoning, infrastructure, incentives. CDEs listed are New Markets Tax Credit allocatees that have already financed deals inside this county's designated tracts: the organizations with a working track record of underwriting there.

County Designated / eligible Rural OZ 1.0 kept / lost Residents NMTC CDEs active in designated tracts
Ada County 7 / 15 — 0 / 4 26,591 Key Community Development New Markets LLC; Montana Community Development Corporation; Northern CDE Corporation; Zions Community Investment Corp.
Canyon County 3 / 13 — 1 / 2 9,104 Hampton Roads Ventures, LLC; Key Community Development New Markets LLC
Bannock County 2 / 8 — 1 / 0 7,388 —
Kootenai County 2 / 4 — 0 / 1 10,042 CCG Community Partners, LLC
Latah County 2 / 4 2 1 / 2 12,711 —
Bonner County 1 / 5 1 0 / 1 2,881 —
Cassia County 1 / 2 1 0 / 0 3,916 —
Gem County 1 / 1 1 0 / 0 7,270 —
Jerome County 1 / 1 1 0 / 1 3,064 —
Madison County 1 / 4 1 0 / 0 4,523 —
Nez Perce County 1 / 1 1 0 / 1 3,629 —
Power County 1 / 1 — 0 / 0 1,650 —
Shoshone County 1 / 1 1 1 / 0 4,070 Zions Community Investment Corp.
Twin Falls County 1 / 5 — 1 / 1 3,888 Montana Community Development Corporation
Adams County 0 / 1 — 0 / 1 — —
Elmore County 0 / 1 — 0 / 1 — —
Gooding County 0 / 1 — 0 / 2 — —
Lewis County 0 / 2 — 0 / 1 — —

Counties with no designated tracts are listed only if they lost OZ 1.0 tracts. NMTC: CDFI Fund NMTC public data release. 6 distinct CDEs across Idaho's designated tracts.

Find projects and partners in the designated tracts

Every designated tract in Idaho, tagged by the signals that point to a project type or a partner. Pick tags to narrow the list — a tract must carry every tag selected. Tags are simple published rules, not a score; hover a tag for its definition.

25 of 25 tracts shown

Download all eligible tracts, national (CSV) →
Tract County Pov. MFI Pop. Rent. Vac. Signals Prior NMTC CDEs
16001000101 Ada County 37.5% 69.2% 1,744 95.2% 10%
NMTC track recordHousing pressure
Key Community Development New Markets LLC; Zions Community Investment Corp. $0.2M · 2 deals
16001000102 Ada County 22.2% 41.2% 3,049 84.7% 11%
NMTC track recordUI Tier 1
Key Community Development New Markets LLC; Montana Community Development Corporation; Northern CDE Corporation; Zions Community Investment Corp. $36.2M · 8 deals
16001000901 Ada County 23.1% 111.6% 2,144 47.3% 1.5%
UI Tier 1
—
16001000902 Ada County 43.1% 47.8% 6,324 94.1% 18.6%
CRA-eligibleHousing pressureHigh vacancy
—
16001001100 Ada County 18.2% 63.6% 5,429 51.2% 6.7%
NMTC track recordCRA-eligibleUI Tier 1
Key Community Development New Markets LLC; Zions Community Investment Corp. $36.5M · 7 deals
16001002319 Ada County 18.3% 66.7% 4,047 56.9% 5.7%
CRA-eligibleHousing pressureUI Tier 1
—
16001010348 Ada County 22.6% 69.7% 3,854 43% 0%
—
16005001400 Rexburg Bannock County 20.9% 73.7% 4,700 32.7% 2.8%
CRA-eligibleUI Tier 1
—
16005001601 Bannock County 15.5% 63.4% 2,688 59.7% 10.3%
Former OZ 1.0UI Tier 1
—
16017950702 Bonner County 11.5% 69.8% 2,881 18.2% 13.5%
Rural / QROFCRA-eligible
—
16027020100 Canyon County 28.4% 53.3% 1,421 54.8% 3.8%
CRA-eligibleHousing pressure
—
16027020200 Pocatello Canyon County 25.8% 53.6% 4,614 63.1% 3.1%
Former OZ 1.0NMTC track recordCRA-eligibleHousing pressureUI Tier 1
Hampton Roads Ventures, LLC; Key Community Development New Markets LLC $18.5M · 2 deals
16027021300 Coeur d'Alene Canyon County 12.6% 66.1% 3,069 65.9% 8.5%
CRA-eligibleUI Tier 1
—
16031950400 Cassia County 26.1% 46.6% 3,916 49.7% 7.3%
Rural / QROFCRA-eligibleUI Tier 1
—
16045960200 Gem County 18.7% 60.1% 7,270 36% 3.4%
Rural / QROFCRA-eligibleUI Tier 1
—
16053970502 Jerome County 20.5% 99% 3,064 17.8% 3.1%
Rural / QROF
—
16055000401 Boise City Kootenai County 21.6% 93.4% 7,024 28% 3.7%
—
16055000901 Kootenai County 16.6% 66.6% 3,018 76.2% 10.6%
NMTC track recordCRA-eligibleHousing pressureUI Tier 1
CCG Community Partners, LLC
16057005302 Pocatello Latah County 32.9% 71.6% 5,988 72.7% 2.2%
Rural / QROFHousing pressure
—
16057005400 Latah County 28.1% 89.2% 6,723 54.7% 13.6%
Rural / QROFFormer OZ 1.0
—
16065950200 Madison County 27% 55% 4,523 78.7% 11.9%
Rural / QROFCRA-eligibleHousing pressurePersistent poverty
—
16069960400 Nez Perce County 15.4% 59.5% 3,629 28% 5.5%
Rural / QROFCRA-eligible
—
16077960100 Fort Hall Reservation Power County 13.3% 67.7% 1,650 11.9% 10.9%
CRA-eligibleTribal
—
16079960300 Shoshone County 15.5% 64.7% 4,070 41.3% 13.5%
Rural / QROFFormer OZ 1.0NMTC track recordCRA-eligibleUI Tier 1
Zions Community Investment Corp. $1.9M · 1 deal
16083001100 Boise City Twin Falls County 19.1% 57.4% 3,888 78.4% 10.8%
Former OZ 1.0NMTC track recordCRA-eligibleUI Tier 1
Montana Community Development Corporation

Reading the signals for projects

  • Rural / QROF — a rural QOF investment gets a 30% basis step-up at five years, and existing buildings need only 50% improvement. Rehab of existing stock pencils here in ways it does not elsewhere. Mechanics →
  • Housing pressure — mostly renters, most of them cost-burdened. Housing deals here have demand; they also carry displacement risk, which is where community benefit terms matter.
  • High vacancy — vacant structures to bring back. Pair with the 50% rural improvement threshold where both apply.
  • UI Tier 1 — the Urban Institute's read that private capital is likely to come and the impact would be larger.

Reading the signals for partners

  • NMTC track record — the listed CDEs have underwritten deals in this exact tract. They know the market and can layer NMTC with OZ equity. How they stack →
  • CRA-eligible — bank investment here earns CRA credit. Start with community development officers at banks with branches in the county.
  • Former OZ 1.0 — QOFs and sponsors may already hold assets here. They are the most likely early OZ 2.0 investors and know the local approvals path.
  • Tribal — the tribal government is a principal, not a stakeholder to consult. Persistent poverty — USDA Rural Development programs can fill gaps.

Data context

0

Eligible tracts in EIG DCI top distress quintile

The EIG Distressed Communities Index (2019–2023) is referenced in many state scoring rubrics. Quintile 1 = most distressed. See whether OZ 1.0 reached the most distressed places →

1

Counties with eligible tracts designated USDA persistent poverty

Persistent poverty = 20%+ poverty rate in every census 1980–2010. Source: USDA ERS County Typology Codes (2015 edition). Relevant for USDA RD program eligibility and QROF rural bonus. See QROF rural bonus mechanics →

32

Prior NMTC investments in eligible OZ tracts

CDFI Fund NMTC Public Data Release (2024). Indicates prior CDFI capital deployment track record in these tracts. See how NMTC and OZ stack →

54

Eligible tracts with CRA designation (LMI or distressed/underserved)

Banks earn CRA credit for investing in low- or moderate-income tracts (Track 1), and in non-metropolitan middle-income tracts officially designated distressed or underserved by FFIEC (Track 2). When an OZ project sits in a CRA-eligible tract, bank capital can satisfy CRA obligations while generating OZ tax benefits. How CRA and OZ interact →

Cities: Boise, Pocatello, Caldwell, Nampa, Idaho Falls and 31 more

ZIP codes: 83201, 83401, 83706, 83704, 83705 and 53 more

See all 36 cities and 58 ZIP codes

All cities:

Boise, Pocatello, Caldwell, Nampa, Idaho Falls, Rexburg, Coeur D Alene, Blackfoot, Twin Falls, Firth, New Plymouth, Spirit Lake, Smelterville, Sandpoint, Salmon, Burley, Priest River, Carmen, Parma, Notus, North Fork, Nezperce, Colburn, Fort Hall, Lewiston, Letha, Kingston, Blanchard, Kellogg, Kamiah, Emmett, Hill City, Gooding, Gibbsonville, Garden City, Kimberly

All ZIP codes:

83201, 83401, 83706, 83704, 83705, 83440, 83605, 83402, 83202, 83814, 83607, 83687, 83204, 83815, 83404, 83460, 83221, 83301, 83686, 83651, 83709, 83713, 83205, 83203, 83236, 83714, 83725, 83656, 83804, 83837, 83839, 83856, 83864, 83865, 83868, 83660, 83617, 83655, 83209, 83303, 83318, 83330, 83337, 83341, 83403, 83405, 83406, 83462, 83653, 83463, 83466, 83467, 83501, 83536, 83543, 83606, 83636, 83869

Look up a specific tract (FFIEC) → Source: FFIEC Census Flat File 2026, joined to IRS Rev. Proc. 2026-14 eligible tracts.

27

Eligible tracts in top investability quintile (Urban Institute model)

The Urban Institute investability model scores OZ-eligible tracts by predicted likelihood of attracting private capital, based on OZ 1.0 investment patterns. Quintile 1 = highest predicted investability among scored tracts. Not all tracts are scored — coverage reflects tracts with sufficient OZ 1.0 data.

Who to contact

Native / tribal

No formal tribal consultation process has been published for Idaho's OZ 2.0 nomination. If your jurisdiction contains or is adjacent to tribal land, contact the relevant Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) or tribal government directly before submitting a nomination.

Designations: Treasury, 2027 QOZ designations and revised eligible-tract file (October 30, 2026). Demographics: ACS 2020–2024 5-year. OZ 1.0: IRS Notice 2018-48, crosswalked to 2020 tracts. Eligible tract counts: IRS Rev. Proc. 2026-14 (April 6, 2026). Rural designation: Notice 2025-50, Section 4.01. Status tier last verified 2026-06-16. Full methodology.